高级检索

低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗高龄急性缺血性脑卒中患者的临床疗效对比

Clinical efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis with low-dose and standard-dose alteplase is similar in the treatment of elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨低剂量(0.6 mg/kg)与标准剂量(0.9 mg/kg)阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗高龄(年龄>80岁)急性脑梗死患者的疗效与安全性。方法:将40例发病3 h内的高龄脑卒中患者分为阿替普酶低剂量组(n=21)和标准剂量组(n=19),比较两组患者的一般情况、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(National Institute of Health stroke scale, NIHSS)评分、出血事件、发病90 d改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分和90 d死亡率。结果:低剂量组与标准剂量组患者一般临床资料、基线NIHSS评分、溶栓24 h及溶栓7 d NIHSS差异无统计学意义。低剂量组与标准剂量组患者出血性脑梗死发生率、发病90 d死亡率以及90 d的mRS评分0~2分患者比例差异均无统计学意义。结论:高龄急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶静脉溶栓的疗效及安全类似。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolytic therapy with low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) or standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) alteplase in the treatment of elderly patients (age>80 years) with acute ischemic stroke. Methods:Fourty elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke within 3 hours after onset were randomly divided into two groups: 21 patients in the low-dose alteplase group and 19 patients in the standard-dose alteplase group. The general situation, National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) scores, bleeding events, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score after 90 days of morbidity, and 90-day mortality were compared between the two groups. Results:There was no significant difference in general clinical data, baseline NIHSS score, and 24 h and 7 d NIHSS score between low-dose group and standard-dose group. And no significant difference was found in the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage, the 90-day mortality, and the ratio of 90-day mRS score of 0-2 between the two groups. Conclusions:Low-dose alteplase has similar efficacy and safety profile compared with standard-dose alteplase in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke.

     

/

返回文章
返回