高级检索

评分对高龄急性冠状动脉综合征患者介入治疗预后的评估价值

Significance of Barthel index in elderly acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

  • 摘要: 目的:评价Barthel评分应用于高龄急性冠状动脉综合征患者冠脉介入治疗的意义。方法:选择181例75岁以上因急性冠状动脉综合征行冠脉介入治疗的患者。根据Barthel评分,将其分成3组:<70分组(n=62)、≥70~90分组(n=72)及≥90分组(n=47)。比较3组患者住院后1个月内的临床转归。结果:与≥90分组相比,<70分组患者年龄较大、女性比例更高、入院时收缩压较低、白细胞计数更多、既往消化性溃疡比例较低、 ST段抬高型心肌梗死比例更高、进行急诊介入治疗的比例更高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与≥90分组相比,<70分组术后左心室射血分数较低、脑钠肽前体(pro- BNP)水平更高、消化道出血比例更高、住院时间更长,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。≥70~90分组和≥90分组上述指标差异均无统计学意义。结论:罹患急性冠状动脉综合征且Barthel评分小于70分的高龄患者住院后1个月内临床转归不佳;这类患者进行冠脉介入治疗时,应慎重权衡风险与获益。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the significance of Barthel index (BI) in elderly acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods:One hundred and eighty one elderly ACS patients undergoing PCI were divided into three groups based on BI: group A (BI<70,n=62), group B (BI≥70- 90, n=72), and group C (BI≥90, n=47). The clinical characteristics and outcomes within one month after hospitalization were compared among 3 groups. Results:Compared with group C, patients in group A were older, with higher proportion of women, lower systolic blood pressure, higher white cell count, higher rates of previous peptic ulcer, higher proportion of ST- segment elevated myocardial infarction and emergency PCI (all P<0.05). In terms of clinical outcomes, patients in group A had lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher pro- brain natriuretic peptide, more gastrointestinal bleeding events, and longer hospital stay. There was no significant difference between group B and group C in clinical characteristics and outcomes. Conclusions:Elderly patients with ACS and BI less than 70 had poor clinical outcome within one month after hospitalization. The risks and benefits for these patients should be carefully weighed when considering the coronary intervention.

     

/

返回文章
返回