高级检索

不同方式注射重组腺相关病毒对肾脏足细胞感染效率的影响

Effects of different injection methods of recombinant adeno-associated virus on the infection efficiency in renal podocytes

  • 摘要:
    目的 比较尾静脉注射、肾实质(多点)注射及经肾实质肾盂注射3种方式注射重组腺相关病毒(recombinant adeno-associated virus, rAAV)后肾脏足细胞的感染效率。
    方法 构建携带足细胞特异性启动子及荧光基团的rAAV,选取4周龄的SPF级C57BL/6雄性小鼠共24只,按照不同的感染方式将小鼠随机分为对照组、尾静脉注射组、肾实质注射组和肾盂注射组,每组6只。在rAAV感染4周后统一取材,检测血清生化指标、尿白蛋白/肌酐比值(urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, UACR)、组织病理苏木精-伊红(hematoxylin and eosin, HE)染色以评估其生物安全性。采用实时荧光定量PCR(quantitative real-time PCR, qPCR)及Western印迹法分析rAAV在肾脏中的表达情况。使用肾脏组织荧光染色确定rAAV在肾脏的表达定位。
    结果 实验过程中,肾实质注射组小鼠死亡1只、肾盂注射组小鼠死亡3只,其余小鼠存活。注射4周后,4组小鼠的AST(P=0.036)和UACR水平(P=0.028)差异有统计学意义,但肾实质注射组UACR水平相较对照组未显著升高。心脏、肝脏、脾脏、肺脏和肾脏组织HE染色未观察到显著的病理学损伤。Western印迹法和qPCR结果显示,肾实质注射组绿色荧光蛋白(green fluorescent protein, GFP)相对表达量及EGFP目的基因表达均高于其余3组(P<0.01)。肾脏组织荧光染色强度定量结果显示,肾实质注射组GFP强度高于对照组(P<0.0001)、尾静脉注射组(P<0.0001)和肾盂注射组(P<0.001)。
    结论 3种注射方式均未见明显组织毒性。其中,肾实质注射携带足细胞特异性启动子的rAAV感染效率最高。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To compare the infection efficiency of podocytes in the kidney following recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) delivery by three routes: tail vein injection, renal parenchymal (multiple-site) injection, and renal pelvis injection via the renal parenchyma.
    Methods An rAAV vector carrying a podocyte-specific promoter and a fluorescent reporter was constructed. A total of 24 four-week-old specific-pathogen-free (SPF) male C57BL/6 mice were randomly assigned according to the infection method to a control group, a tail vein injection group, a renal parenchymal injection group, or a renal pelvis injection group (6 mice per group). Four weeks after rAAV infection, samples were collected from all mice. Biosafety was assessed by measuring serum biochemical indices and the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining of tissue sections. Renal expression of rAAV was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and Western blotting. Fluorescence staining of kidney tissue was used to determine the localization of rAAV expression.
    Results During the experiment, one mouse in the renal parenchymal injection group and three mice in the renal pelvic injection group died; the remaining mice survived. Four weeks after injection, AST (P=0.036) and UACR levels (P=0.028) differed significantly among the four groups; however, UACR in the renal parenchymal injection group was not significantly higher than that in the control group. HE staining revealed no significant pathological damage in the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, or kidneys. Western blotting and qPCR showed that expression of relative green fluorescent protein (GFP) and the EGFP target gene were higher in the renal parenchymal injection group than in the other three groups (P<0.01). Quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity in kidney tissue showed that GFP intensity was higher in the renal parenchymal injection group than in the control group (P<0.0001), tail vein injection group (P<0.0001), and renal pelvis injection group (P<0.001).
    Conclusions None of the three injection methods caused evident tissue toxicity. Among them, renal parenchymal injection of rAAV carrying a podocyte-specific promoter achieved the highest infection efficiency.

     

/

返回文章
返回