高级检索

D-二聚体对急性心肌梗死患者院内死亡及射血分数降低型心力衰竭的预测价值

Predictive value of D-dimer for in-hospital mortality and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in patients with acute myocardial infarction

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨D-二聚体对急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)患者院内死亡及射血分数降低型心力衰竭(heart failure with reduced ejection fraction,HFrEF)的预测价值。
    方法 回顾性纳入2020年1月至2023年12月于复旦大学附属中山医院住院治疗的AMI患者共688例。收集患者一般临床资料、实验室指标、超声心动图参数及住院期间临床结局。主要观察终点为院内死亡和HFrEF发生。采用多因素logistic回归分析D-二聚体与院内死亡及HFrEF的独立相关性,并应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价其预测效能。
    结果 随着D-二聚体水平升高,患者年龄、炎症指标、肌钙蛋白峰值及氨基末端脑利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平逐渐升高,而左心室射血分数逐渐降低。不同D-二聚体组间HFrEF发生率和院内死亡率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,D-二聚体升高与AMI患者院内死亡风险增加独立相关(OR=1.251,95%CI 1.093~1.432,P=0.001),同时亦与HFrEF发生独立相关(OR=1.075,95%CI 1.028~1.124,P=0.002)。ROC曲线分析显示,D-二聚体预测院内死亡的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.871,预测HFrEF的AUC为0.716。当截断值为0.47 mg/L时,D-二聚体预测HFrEF的灵敏度和特异度分别为81.9%和52.1%;当截断值为2.18 mg/L时,D-二聚体预测院内死亡的灵敏度和特异度分别为63.6%和93.8%。限制性立方样条分析显示,D-二聚体与院内死亡及HFrEF发生风险均存在显著非线性关联(P<0.001)。
    结论 D-二聚体水平升高与AMI患者院内死亡及HFrEF发生风险增加显著相关,并具有一定预测效能。D-二聚体作为一种简便、可及的实验室指标,可为AMI患者早期风险分层和临床管理提供参考。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To investigate the predictive value of D-dimer for in-hospital mortality and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
    Methods A total of 688 patients with AMI who were hospitalized at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between January 2020 and December 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, echocardiographic parameters, and in-hospital outcomes were collected. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and HFrEF. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the independent associations of D-dimer with in-hospital mortality and HFrEF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate its predictive performance.
    Results With increasing D-dimer levels, age, inflammatory markers, peak troponin, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels progressively increased, whereas left ventricular ejection fraction progressively decreased. The incidence of HFrEF and in-hospital mortality differed significantly among the D-dimer groups (P<0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that elevated D-dimer was independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with AMI (OR=1.251, 95% CI 1.093–1.432, P=0.001), and was also independently associated with HFrEF (OR=1.075, 95% CI 1.028-1.124, P=0.002). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of D-dimer for predicting in-hospital mortality was 0.871, while the AUC for predicting HFrEF was 0.716. At a cutoff value of 0.47 mg/L, the sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer in predicting HFrEF were 81.9% and 52.1%, respectively; at a cutoff value of 2.18 mg/L, the sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer in predicting in-hospital mortality were 63.6% and 93.8%, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated significant non-linear associations between D-dimer and the risks of in-hospital mortality and HFrEF (P<0.001).
    Conclusions  Elevated D-dimer levels are significantly associated with increased risks of in-hospital mortality and HFrEF in patients with AMI and showed acceptable predictive performance. As a simple and readily available laboratory biomarker, D-dimer may provide useful information for early risk stratification and clinical management in patients with AMI.

     

/

返回文章
返回