高级检索

心血管疾病危险因素与乳腺癌之间的相关性分析

牛瑞洁, 曾军, 李宙童, 汪成, 蒋金全

牛瑞洁,曾 军,李宙童,等. 心血管疾病危险因素与乳腺癌之间的相关性分析[J]. 中国临床医学, 2024, 31(6): 932-938. DOI: 10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2024.20240861
引用本文: 牛瑞洁,曾 军,李宙童,等. 心血管疾病危险因素与乳腺癌之间的相关性分析[J]. 中国临床医学, 2024, 31(6): 932-938. DOI: 10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2024.20240861
NIU R J, ZENG J, LI Z T, et al. Analysis of associations between risk factors for cardiovascular disease and breast cancer[J]. Chin J Clin Med, 2024, 31(6): 932-938. DOI: 10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2024.20240861
Citation: NIU R J, ZENG J, LI Z T, et al. Analysis of associations between risk factors for cardiovascular disease and breast cancer[J]. Chin J Clin Med, 2024, 31(6): 932-938. DOI: 10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2024.20240861

心血管疾病危险因素与乳腺癌之间的相关性分析

基金项目: 上海市黄浦区科技项目(HLM202112),上海市黄浦区骨干医师人才培养计划(2023GG04),上海市黄浦区青年医师人才培养计划(2021QN06).
详细信息
    作者简介:

    牛瑞洁,硕士,主治医师. E-mail:twinkleniu@163.com

    通讯作者:

    曾军: Tel: 021-23308990,E-mail:zengjun76@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R 737.9

Analysis of associations between risk factors for cardiovascular disease and breast cancer

Funds: Supported by Science and Technology Project of Shanghai Huangpu District (HLM202112), Backbone Physician Training Program of Shanghai Huangpu District (2023GG04), and Young Physician Training Program of Shanghai Huangpu District (2021QN06).
  • 摘要:
    目的 

    探讨心血管疾病危险因素与乳腺癌之间的相关性。

    方法 

    连续选择2023年1月至2023年6月在上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院黄浦分院乳腺外科就诊并接受手术的300例确诊为乳腺癌和300例确诊为乳腺良性疾病的患者。比较两组患者相关心血管疾病危险因素。按照绝经与否进行分层,比较两组不同月经状态患者相关心血管疾病危险因素。采用logistic回归分析乳腺癌相关心血管疾病危险因素。

    结果 

    两组患者临床及实验室指标差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄(OR=1.03, P=0.029)、三酰甘油(TG;OR=1.94,P=0.025)、C反应蛋白(OR=2.73, P<0.001)、D-二聚体(OR=61.19, P<0.001)和同型半胱氨酸 (OR=2.10,P<0.001)是乳腺癌发生独立相关因素。分层分析结果显示,绝经前及绝经后,年龄、TG、C反应蛋白、D-二聚体和同型半胱氨酸均与乳腺癌发生独立相关(P<0.05)。

    结论 

    心血管疾病危险因素中,年龄增加,TG、C反应蛋白、D-二聚体和同型半胱氨酸水平升高可能导致乳腺癌发生风险增加,有助于筛查乳腺癌高危患者。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    To explore the associations between risk factors for cardiovascular disease and breast cancer.

    Methods 

    A total of 300 patients with breast cancer and 300 with benign breast diseases diagnosed by postoperative pathology were included in the Department of Breast Surgery, Huangpu Branch of the Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2023 to June 2023. The main cardiovascular risk factors in patients between the two groups were compared. Stratification was performed according to menstrual status, and the main cardiovascular risk factors in patients with different menstrual status between the two groups were compared. The logistic regression correlation analysis was used to analyze the risk factors related to cardiovascular disease for breast cancer.

    Results 

    There were statistically significant differences in clinical data and laboratory indicators between the two groups (P<0.01) . Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR=1.03, P=0.029), triglyceride (TG; OR=1.94, P=0.025), C-reactive protein (CRP; OR=2.73, P<0.001), D-dimer (OR=61.19, P<0.001), and homocysteine (Hcy; OR=2.10, P<0.001) were independently associated with breast cancer. The stratified analysis showed age, TG, CRP, D-dimer, and Hcy were independently associated with breast cancer in both premenopausal and postmenopausal patients (P<0.05).

    Conclusions 

    Among risk factors for cardiovascular disease, advanced age, increased TG, CRP, D-dimer, and Hcy might increase breast cancer risk, which are helpful of screening high-risk individuals for breast cancer.

  • 乳腺癌是女性癌症死亡的第一大原因。2020年乳腺癌新确诊患者估计226万例,女性乳腺癌死亡68万例,分别占女性癌症新确诊人数的24.5%和女性癌症死亡人数的15.5%[1]。以手术为主的综合治疗(化疗、靶向治疗、内分泌治疗、免疫治疗及放疗等)显著延长了乳腺癌患者生存期。然而,各种抗肿瘤治疗均可导致或加重心血管疾病(cardiovascular disease,CVD)[2]。乳腺癌合并CVD患者死亡率常高于同分类同分期单一乳腺癌患者,两种疾病之间可能存在直接联系[3]。因此,早期筛选出乳腺癌合并CVD危险因素的高危人群并及时进行干预是提高这类患者生存率的关键。

    乳腺癌危险因素很多,发病机制仍未明确,目前针对乳腺癌的一级预防措施也有限。而CVD的发病因素和预防措施更确切。美国心脏协会(AHA)心血管健康评估指南[4]指出,体质量指数、胆固醇、血糖、血压为CVD相关因素。C反应蛋白(CRP)[5]、D-二聚体[6]、同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)[7]等也与CVD发生显著相关。目前,降脂药物已成为预防动脉粥样硬化性CVD(ASCVD)的主要手段[8]。肥胖也是影响CVD发生以及预后的重要因素[9]

    上述CVD危险因素易监测和预防。本研究探讨这些因素与乳腺癌发病的相关性,希望发现这2种疾病交叉危险因素,为建立早期乳腺癌并发CVD风险预测模式和分级筛查策略,有效延缓或避免同时罹患这2种疾病提供参考。

    连续选择2023年1月至2023年6月于上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院黄浦分院乳腺外科住院并接受手术的女性患者,根据术后病理诊断结果,纳入300例乳腺癌和300例乳腺良性疾病患者。排除标准:(1)缺乏病理诊断;(2)乳腺炎患者;(3)再次入院患者。

    通过我院电子病例系统和检验系统收集患者的相关指标。(1)临床指标:年龄、身高、体质量、合并症(高血压、糖尿病);(2)实验室指标:空腹血糖(FPG)、三酰甘油(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、CRP、D-二聚体、Hcy;(3)病理结果。

    采用R 4.3.0进行统计分析,计数资料以n(%)表示,组间比较采用χ2检验。对计量资料进行正态检验,符合正态分布时以$ \overline x $±s表示,组间比较采用t检验;不符合正态分布时以M(P25, P75)表示,组间比较采用非参数检验。筛选单因素分析中差异有统计学意义的指标,进行多因素logistic回归分析。进一步根据患者绝经与否,进行分层分析。检验水准(α)为0.05。

    结果(表1)显示,乳腺癌组和乳腺良性病变组年龄、合并症、FPG、血脂、CRP、D-二聚体、Hcy差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。

    表  1  两组患者临床、实验室指标比较
    Table  1.  Comparison of clinical and laboratorial indices between the two groups n=300
     Index Breast cancer group Benign breast disease group P
    Age/year 61.0(51.00, 67.00) 42.00(35.00, 52.00) <0.001
    Diabetes n(%) 37(12.3) 7(2.3) <0.001
    Hypertension n(%) 135(45.0) 39(13.1) <0.001
    BMI/(kg·m﹣2) 23.5(21.48, 26.04) 21.60(19.99, 23.35) <0.001
    FPG/(mmol·L﹣1) 5.19(4.70, 5.86) 4.68(4.31, 5.10) <0.001
    TG/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.44(1.03, 1.95) 1.03(0.74, 1.28) <0.001
    TC/(mmol·L﹣1) 5.10(4.40, 5.70) 4.50(4.00, 5.10) <0.001
    LDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 2.95(2.38, 3.58) 2.34(1.98, 2.84) <0.001
    HDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.32(1.03, 1.55) 1.40(1.14, 1.61) 0.006
    CRP/(mg·L﹣1) 1.02(0.5, 3.54) 0.50(0.0, 0.58) <0.001
    D-dimer/(mg·L﹣1) 0.49(0.29, 0.82) 0.19(0.14, 0.29) <0.001
    Hcy/(μmol·L﹣1) 9.10(7.60, 11.0) 6.05(4.90, 7.10) <0.001
      BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    将上述指标纳入logistic回归分析,结果(表2)显示:上述指标均与乳腺癌相关,其中年龄、TG、CRP、D-二聚体和Hcy为乳腺癌独立相关因素(P<0.05)。

    表  2  心血管疾病危险因素与乳腺癌关系的logistic回归分析
    Table  2.  Logistic regression analysis of associations between cardiovascular risk factors and breast cancer
     Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
    OR(95%CI) P OR(95%CI) P
    Age 1.10(1.08-1.12) <0.001 1.03(1.00-1.06) 0.029
    Diabetes 5.89(2.58-13.43) <0.001 1.48(0.31-6.94) 0.622
    Hypertension 5.48(3.65-8.22) <0.001 1.01(0.46-2.25) 0.972
    BMI 1.25(1.17-1.32) <0.001 0.30(0.06-1.61) 0.162
    FPG 2.82(2.16-3.68) <0.001 1.36(0.86-2.17) 0.187
    TG 2.77(2.07-3.69) <0.001 1.94(1.08-3.46) 0.025
    TC 2.15(1.75-2.63) <0.001 0.96(0.42-2.22) 0.927
    LDL-C 2.19(1.76-2.72) <0.001 1.70(0.73-3.97) 0.216
    HDL-C 0.60(0.39-0.92) 0.021 2.19(0.68-7.07) 0.189
    CRP 3.48(2.52-4.79) <0.001 2.73(1.74-4.28) <0.001
    D-dimer 371.80(117.33-1178.17) <0.001 61.19(13.97-267.99) <0.001
    Hcy 2.19(1.91-2.51) <0.001 2.10(1.74-2.53) <0.001
      BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    结果(表3表4)显示:绝经前,除糖尿病患者比例及HDL-C水平外,乳腺癌组和乳腺良性病变组其他指标差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);绝经后,除HDL-C水平外,乳腺癌组和乳腺良性病变组其他指标差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。将组间差异有统计学意义及有临床意义的指标纳入logistic回归分析,结果(表5表6)显示:绝经前,年龄、TG、CRP、D-二聚体和Hcy为乳腺癌独立相关因素(P<0.05);绝经后,除高血压患者比例、HDL-C水平外,其他指标均为乳腺癌独立相关因素(P<0.05)。

    表  3  两组绝经前患者临床、实验室指标比较
    Table  3.  Comparison of clinical and laboratorial indices in premenopausal patients between the two groups
     Index Breast cancer group (n=65) Benign breast disease group (n=204) P
    Age/year 42.4±5.8 37.6±7.4 <0.001
    Diabetes n(%) 1(1.5) 1(0.5) 0.978
    Hypertension n(%) 8(12.3) 9(4.4) 0.047
    BMI/(kg·m﹣2) 23.5±3.2 21.5±2.7 <0.001
    FPG/(mmol·L﹣1) 5.0±1.3 4.7±0.5 0.011
    TG/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.6±1.5 1.1±0.5 0.001
    TC/(mmol·L﹣1) 4.9±1.3 4.5±0.7 0.004
    LDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 2.8±0.8 2.4±0.7 <0.001
    HDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.4±0.4 1.4±0.4 0.327
    CRP/(mg·L﹣1) 1.7±2.0 0.5±0.6 <0.001
    D-dimer/(mg·L﹣1) 0.6±0.7 0.2±0.1 <0.001
    Hcy/(μmol·L﹣1) 9.3±3.5 5.6±2.0 <0.001
      BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格
    表  4  两组绝经后患者临床、实验室指标比较
    Table  4.  Comparison of clinical and laboratorial indices in postmenopausal patients between the two groups
     Index Breast cancer group (n=235) Benign breast disease group (n=96) P
    Age/year 64.2±8.0 59.1±7.4 <0.001
    Diabetes n(%) 36(15.3) 6(6.2) 0.039
    hypertension n(%) 127(54.0) 30(31.2) <0.001
    BMI/(kg·m﹣2) 24.2±3.9 22.9±2.6 0.001
    FPG/(mmol·L﹣1) 5.7±1.5 5.0±0.8 <0.001
    TG/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.8±1.3 1.2±0.5 <0.001
    TC/(mmol·L﹣1) 5.2±1.0 4.7±0.9 <0.001
    LDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 3.0±0.9 2.6±0.8 <0.001
    HDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.3±0.4 1.3±0.3 0.525
    CRP/(mg·L﹣1) 3.8±8.1 0.6±0.6 <0.001
    D-dimer/(mg·L﹣1) 0.8 ±1.1 0.3±0.2 <0.001
    Hcy/(μmol·L﹣1) 9.7±3.1 6.3±2.0 <0.001
      BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格
    表  5  Logistic回归分析绝经前心血管疾病危险因素与乳腺癌的相关性
    Table  5.  Logistic regression analysis of associations between risk factors for cardiovascular disease and breast cancer in premenopausal patients
     Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
    OR(95%CI) P OR(95%CI) P
    Age 1.12(1.06-1.17) <0.001 1.09(1.01-1.18) 0.024
    Diabetes 3.04(1.12-8.24) 0.029 0.85(0.10-7.42) 0.884
    Hypertension 3.17(0.20-51.44) 0.417
    BMI 1.26(1.14-1.39) <0.001 1.19(0.81-1.76) 0.373
    FPG 1.90(1.15-3.14) 0.012 1.14(0.60-2.14) 0.689
    TG 2.20(1.37-3.54) 0.001 2.15(1.02-4.53) 0.044
    TC 1.69(1.20-2.39) 0.003 0.90(0.33-2.41) 0.828
    LDL-C 2.14(1.44-3.18) <0.001 1.73(0.56-5.31) 0.340
    HDL-C 0.72(0.34-1.53) 0.395
    CRP 2.84(1.92-4.20) <0.001 3.48(1.71-7.07) <0.001
    D-dimer 299.82(51.23-1754.73) <0.001 51.52(4.94-537.64) 0.001
    Hcy 1.98(1.66-2.37) <0.001 2.45(1.75-3.43) <0.001
      BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格
    表  6  Logistic回归分析绝经后心血管疾病危险因素与乳腺癌的相关性
    Table  6.  Logistic regression analysis of associations between risk factors for cardiovascular disease and breast cancer in postmenopausal patients
     VariableUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
    OR(95%CI)POR(95%CI)P
    Age1.09(1.06-1.13)<0.0011.12(1.06-1.17)<0.001
    Diabetes2.59(1.57-4.27)<0.0013.04(1.12-8.24)0.029
    Hypertension2.71(1.10-6.67)0.033.17(0.20-51.44)0.417
    BMI1.12(1.04-1.21)0.0041.26(1.14-1.39)<0.001
    FPG2.08(1.49-2.91)<0.0011.90(1.15-3.14)0.012
    TG2.35(1.56-3.54)<0.0012.20(1.37-3.54)0.001
    TC1.91(1.45-2.52)<0.0011.69(1.20-2.39)0.003
    LDL-C1.77(1.32-2.37)<0.0012.14(1.44-3.18)<0.001
    HDL-C0.82(0.43-1.57)0.5560.72(0.34-1.53)0.395
    CRP3.59(2.10-6.15)<0.0012.84(1.92-4.20)<0.001
    D-dimer182.73(35.30-945.98)<0.001202.28(21.08-1940.80)<0.001
    Hcy2.23(1.77-2.81)<0.0012.01(1.58-2.56)<0.001
      HT: hypertension; BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    我国女性乳腺癌发病率有明显的年龄和地域分布特点:在城市地区,2013至2017年,年龄标准化发病率在45~49岁年龄组开始升高,在60~64岁年龄组达峰值;在农村地区,乳腺癌发病年龄集中于45~49岁和60~64岁[10]。CVD年龄分布特点:女性总体患病率随年龄增加而升高,在45岁后发生率升高明显,65岁后升高加快,在95岁及以上年龄组达峰值[11]。两种疾病流行病学特征显示,45~65岁年龄段人群同时发生两种疾病的可能性更高,是实施两种疾病“共病筛查”须重点关注的高危人群。本研究显示,乳腺癌组与乳腺良性病变组年龄差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),年龄与乳腺癌独立相关(P<0.05)。

    炎症是动脉粥样硬化发病机制的核心[12],而CRP是反映全身性炎症负担的重要生物标志物之一。已有大量研究[5, 13-14]证实,CRP对心血管事件有很强的预测价值。CRP对恶性肿瘤也有预测价值[15]。有临床研究[16-17] 显示,血清CRP水平升高与乳腺癌易感性增强有关。本研究显示,两组CRP差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),CRP与乳腺癌独立相关(P<0.001)。目前尚缺乏CRP导致CVD与乳腺癌的直接证据,可能与以下机制有关:肿瘤遗传学改变(如癌基因的激活和抑癌基因的失活)既诱导肿瘤形成,又促进各种细胞因子和趋化因子产生,从而产生炎症微环境[18];肿瘤细胞将炎症细胞招募到肿瘤微环境中,刺激肿瘤生长并导致更差的预后[19-20];体外实验[21]表明,CRP可以激活整合素α2信号通路,促进乳腺癌和三阴性乳腺癌细胞的生长、黏附和侵袭。

    D-二聚体为评估血栓形成和纤维蛋白溶解程度的标志物,升高提示机体处于高凝状态,而高凝状态与CVD的发生密切相关[22]。肿瘤细胞可以直接激活凝血反应,导致血栓形成,并促进血管内皮细胞、血小板、单核细胞和白细胞噬菌体的促凝特性,抑制其抗凝特性[23]。D-二聚体增加在肿瘤患者中常见。Lu等[22]对15项D-二聚体与乳腺癌发病关系的研究进行了荟萃分析,共纳入1 244例乳腺癌患者,结果显示,与良性对照组和健康对照组相比,乳腺癌组的D-二聚体水平较高,且升高与乳腺癌的孕激素受体(PR)表达、TNM分期和转移有关。本研究结果与荟萃分析相似。

    Hcy是一种含巯基的非必需氨基酸,产生于甲硫氨酸和半胱氨酸相互转化过程。Hcy代谢需要叶酸参与,乳腺癌细胞扩增情况下需要消耗大量的叶酸,导致Hcy代谢减慢而在血液中蓄积[24]。Hcy通过炎症、脂质过氧化和血小板活化等多种机制在内皮功能障碍、动脉粥样硬化和血栓形成中发挥关键作用[25-26]。另有研究[27]显示,Hcy代谢相关基因突变和多态性与乳腺癌的发生有关。本研究中,Hcy是乳腺癌发生的独立相关因素(P<0.001)。Hcy影响肿瘤细胞生长和增殖的机制,以及乳腺癌和CVD之间Hcy代谢存在的共同分子途径和内在联系有待进一步研究。

    本研究中,绝经前、后人群中,年龄、TG、CRP、D-二聚体及Hcy均与乳腺癌独立相关。本研究中,BMI仅与绝经后乳腺癌独立相关,可能与以下因素有关:(1)超重和肥胖的绝经后女性脂肪中雄烯二酮和睾酮向雌激素的转化增加,导致雌激素水平升高[28-29];(2)肥胖妇女体内脂肪组织较多导致内源性雌激素合成增加[30];(3)与正常体质量人群相比,超重和肥胖人群的瘦素水平更高[31],而瘦素会增加雌激素水平[32]

    综上所述,本研究显示,乳腺癌与CVD存在交叉因素,其中年龄增加,TG、CRP、D-二聚体和Hcy水平升高是乳腺癌发生独立危险因素,提示这两种疾病在激素代谢、脂质代谢、炎症、凝血、Hcy代谢等方面存在共同的分子途径。这些共同分子途径介导乳腺癌与CVD之间相互影响。通过联合多中心进行更大样本量的前瞻性队列研究等可验证本研究结论。在目前全球女性乳腺癌与CVD发病率持续上升的趋势下,针对CVD危险因素进行乳腺癌的易感性分析有重要意义。

    致谢 感谢上海交通大学医学院冯铁男教授为本研究提供统计学指导。

    伦理声明 本研究通过上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院黄浦分院伦理委员会审批(2024-KY-01)。

    利益冲突 所有作者声明不存在利益冲突。

    作者贡献 牛瑞洁:数据收集、分析,论文撰写;曾军:研究设计,论文审阅、修改;李宙童:数据整理;汪成、蒋金全:研究指导。

  • 表  1   两组患者临床、实验室指标比较

    Table  1   Comparison of clinical and laboratorial indices between the two groups n=300

     Index Breast cancer group Benign breast disease group P
    Age/year 61.0(51.00, 67.00) 42.00(35.00, 52.00) <0.001
    Diabetes n(%) 37(12.3) 7(2.3) <0.001
    Hypertension n(%) 135(45.0) 39(13.1) <0.001
    BMI/(kg·m﹣2) 23.5(21.48, 26.04) 21.60(19.99, 23.35) <0.001
    FPG/(mmol·L﹣1) 5.19(4.70, 5.86) 4.68(4.31, 5.10) <0.001
    TG/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.44(1.03, 1.95) 1.03(0.74, 1.28) <0.001
    TC/(mmol·L﹣1) 5.10(4.40, 5.70) 4.50(4.00, 5.10) <0.001
    LDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 2.95(2.38, 3.58) 2.34(1.98, 2.84) <0.001
    HDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.32(1.03, 1.55) 1.40(1.14, 1.61) 0.006
    CRP/(mg·L﹣1) 1.02(0.5, 3.54) 0.50(0.0, 0.58) <0.001
    D-dimer/(mg·L﹣1) 0.49(0.29, 0.82) 0.19(0.14, 0.29) <0.001
    Hcy/(μmol·L﹣1) 9.10(7.60, 11.0) 6.05(4.90, 7.10) <0.001
      BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   心血管疾病危险因素与乳腺癌关系的logistic回归分析

    Table  2   Logistic regression analysis of associations between cardiovascular risk factors and breast cancer

     Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
    OR(95%CI) P OR(95%CI) P
    Age 1.10(1.08-1.12) <0.001 1.03(1.00-1.06) 0.029
    Diabetes 5.89(2.58-13.43) <0.001 1.48(0.31-6.94) 0.622
    Hypertension 5.48(3.65-8.22) <0.001 1.01(0.46-2.25) 0.972
    BMI 1.25(1.17-1.32) <0.001 0.30(0.06-1.61) 0.162
    FPG 2.82(2.16-3.68) <0.001 1.36(0.86-2.17) 0.187
    TG 2.77(2.07-3.69) <0.001 1.94(1.08-3.46) 0.025
    TC 2.15(1.75-2.63) <0.001 0.96(0.42-2.22) 0.927
    LDL-C 2.19(1.76-2.72) <0.001 1.70(0.73-3.97) 0.216
    HDL-C 0.60(0.39-0.92) 0.021 2.19(0.68-7.07) 0.189
    CRP 3.48(2.52-4.79) <0.001 2.73(1.74-4.28) <0.001
    D-dimer 371.80(117.33-1178.17) <0.001 61.19(13.97-267.99) <0.001
    Hcy 2.19(1.91-2.51) <0.001 2.10(1.74-2.53) <0.001
      BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   两组绝经前患者临床、实验室指标比较

    Table  3   Comparison of clinical and laboratorial indices in premenopausal patients between the two groups

     Index Breast cancer group (n=65) Benign breast disease group (n=204) P
    Age/year 42.4±5.8 37.6±7.4 <0.001
    Diabetes n(%) 1(1.5) 1(0.5) 0.978
    Hypertension n(%) 8(12.3) 9(4.4) 0.047
    BMI/(kg·m﹣2) 23.5±3.2 21.5±2.7 <0.001
    FPG/(mmol·L﹣1) 5.0±1.3 4.7±0.5 0.011
    TG/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.6±1.5 1.1±0.5 0.001
    TC/(mmol·L﹣1) 4.9±1.3 4.5±0.7 0.004
    LDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 2.8±0.8 2.4±0.7 <0.001
    HDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.4±0.4 1.4±0.4 0.327
    CRP/(mg·L﹣1) 1.7±2.0 0.5±0.6 <0.001
    D-dimer/(mg·L﹣1) 0.6±0.7 0.2±0.1 <0.001
    Hcy/(μmol·L﹣1) 9.3±3.5 5.6±2.0 <0.001
      BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   两组绝经后患者临床、实验室指标比较

    Table  4   Comparison of clinical and laboratorial indices in postmenopausal patients between the two groups

     Index Breast cancer group (n=235) Benign breast disease group (n=96) P
    Age/year 64.2±8.0 59.1±7.4 <0.001
    Diabetes n(%) 36(15.3) 6(6.2) 0.039
    hypertension n(%) 127(54.0) 30(31.2) <0.001
    BMI/(kg·m﹣2) 24.2±3.9 22.9±2.6 0.001
    FPG/(mmol·L﹣1) 5.7±1.5 5.0±0.8 <0.001
    TG/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.8±1.3 1.2±0.5 <0.001
    TC/(mmol·L﹣1) 5.2±1.0 4.7±0.9 <0.001
    LDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 3.0±0.9 2.6±0.8 <0.001
    HDL-C/(mmol·L﹣1) 1.3±0.4 1.3±0.3 0.525
    CRP/(mg·L﹣1) 3.8±8.1 0.6±0.6 <0.001
    D-dimer/(mg·L﹣1) 0.8 ±1.1 0.3±0.2 <0.001
    Hcy/(μmol·L﹣1) 9.7±3.1 6.3±2.0 <0.001
      BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5   Logistic回归分析绝经前心血管疾病危险因素与乳腺癌的相关性

    Table  5   Logistic regression analysis of associations between risk factors for cardiovascular disease and breast cancer in premenopausal patients

     Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
    OR(95%CI) P OR(95%CI) P
    Age 1.12(1.06-1.17) <0.001 1.09(1.01-1.18) 0.024
    Diabetes 3.04(1.12-8.24) 0.029 0.85(0.10-7.42) 0.884
    Hypertension 3.17(0.20-51.44) 0.417
    BMI 1.26(1.14-1.39) <0.001 1.19(0.81-1.76) 0.373
    FPG 1.90(1.15-3.14) 0.012 1.14(0.60-2.14) 0.689
    TG 2.20(1.37-3.54) 0.001 2.15(1.02-4.53) 0.044
    TC 1.69(1.20-2.39) 0.003 0.90(0.33-2.41) 0.828
    LDL-C 2.14(1.44-3.18) <0.001 1.73(0.56-5.31) 0.340
    HDL-C 0.72(0.34-1.53) 0.395
    CRP 2.84(1.92-4.20) <0.001 3.48(1.71-7.07) <0.001
    D-dimer 299.82(51.23-1754.73) <0.001 51.52(4.94-537.64) 0.001
    Hcy 1.98(1.66-2.37) <0.001 2.45(1.75-3.43) <0.001
      BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6   Logistic回归分析绝经后心血管疾病危险因素与乳腺癌的相关性

    Table  6   Logistic regression analysis of associations between risk factors for cardiovascular disease and breast cancer in postmenopausal patients

     VariableUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
    OR(95%CI)POR(95%CI)P
    Age1.09(1.06-1.13)<0.0011.12(1.06-1.17)<0.001
    Diabetes2.59(1.57-4.27)<0.0013.04(1.12-8.24)0.029
    Hypertension2.71(1.10-6.67)0.033.17(0.20-51.44)0.417
    BMI1.12(1.04-1.21)0.0041.26(1.14-1.39)<0.001
    FPG2.08(1.49-2.91)<0.0011.90(1.15-3.14)0.012
    TG2.35(1.56-3.54)<0.0012.20(1.37-3.54)0.001
    TC1.91(1.45-2.52)<0.0011.69(1.20-2.39)0.003
    LDL-C1.77(1.32-2.37)<0.0012.14(1.44-3.18)<0.001
    HDL-C0.82(0.43-1.57)0.5560.72(0.34-1.53)0.395
    CRP3.59(2.10-6.15)<0.0012.84(1.92-4.20)<0.001
    D-dimer182.73(35.30-945.98)<0.001202.28(21.08-1940.80)<0.001
    Hcy2.23(1.77-2.81)<0.0012.01(1.58-2.56)<0.001
      HT: hypertension; BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; TG: triglyceride; TC: total cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hcy: homocysteine.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660

    [2] 沈 赞, 邵志敏, 中华医学会肿瘤学分会肿瘤支持康复治疗学组, 等. 中国乳腺癌相关心脏病诊疗共识(2022年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2022, 32(10): 1016-1036.

    SHEN Z, SHAO Z M, Cancer Support Rehabilitation Therapy Group of Chinese Medical Association Oncology Branch, et al. Chinese consensus of cardio-oncology in breast cancer[J]. China Oncol, 2022, 32(10): 1016-1036.

    [3]

    KOELWYN G J, NEWMAN A A C, AFONSO M S, et al. Myocardial infarction accelerates breast cancer via innate immune reprogramming[J]. Nat Med, 2020, 26(9): 1452-1458. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0964-7

    [4]

    LLOYD-JONES D M, ALLEN N B, ANDERSON C A M, et al. Life’s essential 8: updating and enhancing the American Heart Association’s construct of cardiovascular health: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2022, 146(5): e18-e43.

    [5]

    DANESH J, WHEELER J G, HIRSCHFIELD G M, et al. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(14): 1387-1397. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032804

    [6]

    SIMES J, ROBLEDO K P, WHITE H D, et al. D-dimer predicts long-term cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular events, and cancer in patients with stable coronary heart disease: LIPID study[J]. Circulation, 2018, 138(7): 712-723. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029901

    [7]

    BRUSTOLIN S, GIUGLIANI R, FÉLIX T M. Genetics of homocysteine metabolism and associated disorders[J]. Braz J Med Biol Res, 2010, 43(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-879X2009007500021

    [8]

    GRUNDY S M, STONE N J, BAILEY A L, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2019, 139(25): e1082-e1143.

    [9]

    POWELL-WILEY T M, POIRIER P, BURKE L E, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2021, 143(21): e984-e1010.

    [10]

    SUN K X, LEI L, ZHENG R S, et al. Trends in incidence rates, mortality rates, and age-period-cohort effects of female breast cancer - China, 2003-2017[J]. China CDC Wkly, 2023, 5(15): 340-346. DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2023.065

    [11] 杨 继, 张 垚, 马 腾, 等. 1990—2019年中国心血管疾病流行现状、疾病负担及发病预测分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2024, 27(2): 233-244.

    YANG J, ZHANG Y, MA T, et al. Epidemic status, disease burden and prediction of cardiovascular diseases in China, 1990-2019[J]. Chin Gen Pract, 2024, 27(2): 233-244.

    [12]

    ROSS R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999, 340(2): 115-126. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199901143400207

    [13] 童 薇, 黄其峰, 江小伟, 等. 终末期肾病维持性血液透析患者血清hs-CRP/Alb比值与心血管事件发生的相关性分析[J]. 疑难病杂志, 2023, 22(12): 1297-1301,1312. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6450.2023.12.012

    TONG W, HUANG Q F, JIANG X W, et al. Correlation analysis between serum hs CRP/Alb ratio and cardiovascular events in maintenance hemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease[J]. Chin J Diffic and Compl Cas, 2023, 22(12): 1297-1301,1312. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6450.2023.12.012

    [14]

    KUPPA A, TRIPATHI H, AL-DARRAJI A, et al. C-reactive protein levels and risk of cardiovascular diseases: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(11): 9129. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119129

    [15]

    MARKOZANNES G, KOUTSIOUMPA C, CIVIDINI S, et al. Global assessment of C-reactive protein and health-related outcomes: an umbrella review of evidence from observational studies and Mendelian randomization studies[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2021, 36(1): 11-36. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-020-00681-w

    [16]

    ANDERSEN H H, BOJESEN S E, JOHANSEN J S, et al. Prognostic value of pre-treatment plasma C-reactive protein in patients with early-stage breast cancer[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2024, 33(5): 662-670. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1299

    [17]

    ZHANG Y Y, HUANG X X, YU X X, et al. Hematological and biochemical markers influencing breast cancer risk and mortality: prospective cohort study in the UK biobank by multi-state models[J]. Breast, 2024, 73: 103603. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103603

    [18]

    GRETEN F R, GRIVENNIKOV S I. Inflammation and cancer: triggers, mechanisms, and consequences[J]. Immunity, 2019, 51(1): 27-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.025

    [19]

    KEHM R D, MCDONALD J A, FENTON S E, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers and breast cancer risk: a systematic review of the evidence and future potential for intervention research[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(15): 5445. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155445

    [20]

    ALLIN K H, BOJESEN S E, NORDESTGAARD B G. Inflammatory biomarkers and risk of cancer in 84, 000 individuals from the general population[J]. Int J Cancer, 2016, 139(7): 1493-1500. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30194

    [21]

    KIM E S, KIM S Y, KOH M, et al. C-reactive protein binds to integrin α2 and Fcγ receptor I, leading to breast cell adhesion and breast cancer progression[J]. Oncogene, 2018, 37(1): 28-38. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2017.298

    [22]

    LU Y, ZHANG L Y, ZHANG Q H, et al. The association of D-dimer with clinicopathological features of breast cancer and its usefulness in differential diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(9): e0221374. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221374

    [23]

    HARISH S, RAXITH S R, SARATH C P. Role of plasma D-dimer levels in breast cancer patients and its correlation with clinical and histopathological stage[J]. Indian J Surg Oncol, 2018, 9(3): 307-311. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-017-0682-x

    [24]

    WU X Y, ZOU T N, CAO N, et al. Plasma homocysteine levels and genetic polymorphisms in folate metablism are associated with breast cancer risk in Chinese women[J]. Hered Cancer Clin Pract, 2014, 12(1): 2. DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-12-2

    [25]

    DU X, MA X L, TAN Y, et al. B cell-derived anti-beta 2 glycoprotein Ⅰ antibody mediates hyperhomocysteinemia-aggravated hypertensive glomerular lesions by triggering ferroptosis[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2023, 8(1): 103. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01313-x

    [26]

    HAN L L, MIAO Y T, ZHAO Y, et al. The binding of autotaxin to integrins mediates hyperhomocysteinemia-potentiated platelet activation and thrombosis in mice and humans[J]. Blood Adv, 2022, 6(1): 46-61. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004572

    [27]

    RAHIMI Z, BOZORGI ZARINI M, RAHIMI Z, et al. Variants of genes involved in metabolism of folate among patients with breast cancer: association of TYMS 3R allele with susceptibility to breast cancer and metastasis[J]. Iran J Pathol, 2021, 16(1): 62-68. DOI: 10.30699/ijp.2020.117676.2283

    [28]

    ZIMTA A A, TIGU A B, MUNTEAN M, et al. Molecular links between central obesity and breast cancer[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(21): 5364. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20215364

    [29]

    MORRIS P G, HUDIS C A, GIRI D, et al. Inflammation and increased aromatase expression occur in the breast tissue of obese women with breast cancer[J]. Cancer Prev Res (Phila), 2011, 4(7): 1021-1029. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0110

    [30]

    NEUHOUSER M L, ARAGAKI A K, PRENTICE R L, et al. Overweight, obesity, and postmenopausal invasive breast cancer risk: a secondary analysis of the women’s health initiative randomized clinical trials[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2015, 1(5): 611-621. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1546

    [31]

    HURSTING S D, DIGIOVANNI J, DANNENBERG A J, et al. Obesity, energy balance, and cancer: new opportunities for prevention[J]. Cancer Prev Res (Phila), 2012, 5(11): 1260-1272. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0140

    [32]

    KHODAMORADI K, KHOSRAVIZADEH Z, SEETHARAM D. The role of leptin and low testosterone in obesity[J]. Int J Impot Res, 2022, 34(7): 704-713. DOI: 10.1038/s41443-022-00534-y

表(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  88
  • HTML全文浏览量:  9
  • PDF下载量:  18
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-08-06
  • 录用日期:  2024-10-31
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-11-20
  • 刊出日期:  2024-12-24

目录

/

返回文章
返回