高级检索

细胞因子、经皮氧分压/吸入氧浓度联合危重评分对脓毒症患者进展为脓毒性休克及预后的预测价值

Predictive value of cytokine, TcPO2/FiO2 combined with critical score for septic shock and prognosis in sepsis patients

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨细胞因子、经皮氧分压(TcPO2)/吸入氧浓度(FiO2)及危重评分等对脓毒症患者短期进展为脓毒性休克及其28 d预后的预测价值。
    方法 前瞻性选择2018年7月至2018年12月复旦大学附属中山医院急诊科收治的96例脓毒症患者,患者入院时均未休克。记录入院当天首次测定的TcPO2/FiO2、细胞因子、炎症标志物、肾功能、血乳酸等炎症及灌注相关指标;记录患者入院时急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分和序贯性器官功能衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。根据入院后7 d内是否进展为脓毒性休克分为休克组(n=14)和非休克组(n=82)。根据入院后28 d内是否死亡分为生存组(n=63)和死亡组(n=33)。采用logistic回归分析筛查脓毒症患者短期内进展为脓毒性休克和28 d内预后的危险因素,并采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析相关指标对脓毒症患者进展为脓毒性休克及28 d预后的预测价值。
    结果 脓毒性休克组患者血白细胞计数、白介素(IL)-6、IL-8、IL-10、乳酸、血肌酐、TcPO2/FiO2均高于非休克组(P<0.05)。Logistic多因素回归结果显示,IL-6升高和TcPO2/FiO2降低是脓毒性休克发生的独立危险因素。IL-6、TcPO2/FiO2预测脓毒性休克的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.760(95%CI 0.610~0.911)和0.813(95%CI 0.681~0.944);IL-6、TcPO2/FiO2联合SOFA评分预测脓毒性休克的AUC为0.937(95%CI 0.884~0.991),IL-6、TcPO2/FiO2联合APACHE Ⅱ评分预测脓毒性休克的AUC为0.880(95%CI 0.793~0.968)。白介素2受体(IL-2R)升高是脓毒症患者入院后28 d死亡的独立危险因素,其预测脓毒症患者28 d内死亡的AUC为0.705(95%CI 0.597~0.814);IL-2R联合SOFA评分预测28 d内死亡的AUC为0.702(95%CI 0.593~0.810),IL-2R联合APACHEⅡ评分预测28 d内死亡的AUC为0.729(95%CI 0.626~0.833)。
    结论 IL-6和TcPO2/FiO2检测有助于早期预测脓毒性休克的发生,与SOFA或APACHE Ⅱ评分联合可进一步提高其对脓毒性休克的预测价值;血IL-2R升高提示脓毒症预后不良,与APACHE Ⅱ评分联合可提高其对脓毒症患者入院28 d预后的预测价值。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the values of cytokines, transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen (TcPO2)/fraction of inspiration oxygen (FiO2) and critical score in predicting short-term progression to septic shock and 28-day prognosis of patients with sepsis.
    Methods A total of 96 patients with sepsis admitted to the Emergency Department of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from July 2018 to December 2018 were prospectively screened. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 96 patients with sepsis without shock at admission were enrolled. TcPO2/FiO2, cytokines, inflammatory markers, renal function, blood lactic acid and other inflammation-related and perfusion-related indicators were detected on the day of admission. Systematic scoring was performed using the acute physiology and chronic health scoreⅡ (APACHE Ⅱ) system and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA). According to septic shock occurrence within 7 days after admission, the patients were divided into shock group (n=14) and non-shock group (n=82). According to death within 28 days after admission, the patients were divided into survival group (n=63) and death group (n=33). Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of shock and 28-day prognosis in patients with sepsis, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the evaluation value of related indicators for the prognosis of patients with sepsis.
    Results The WBC count, cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10), lactic acid, serum creatinine, and TcPO2/FiO2 in septic shock group were all higher than those in non-shock group (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression results showed that higher IL-6 and lower TcPO2/FiO2 were independent risk factors for septic shock. The areas under curve (AUC) of IL-6 and TcPO2/FiO2 for predicting shock in septic patients were 0.760 (95%CI 0.610-0.911) and 0.813 (95%CI 0.681-0.944), respectively. The AUC of IL-6, TcPO2/FiO2 combined SOFA score to predict septic shock was 0.937 (95%CI 0.884-0.991), and the AUC of IL-6, TcPO2/FiO2 combined APACHE Ⅱ score was 0.880 (95%CI 0.793-0.968). IL-2R elevation was an independent risk factor for 28-day prognosis, with an AUC of 0.705 (95%CI 0.597-0.814) for predicting 28-day prognosis in patients with sepsis. The AUC of IL-2R combined SOFA score predicting 28-day prognosis was 0.702 (95%CI 0.593-0.810), and the AUC of IL-2R combined APACHE Ⅱ score predicting 28-day prognosis was 0.729 (95%CI 0.626-0.833).
    Conclusions Elevated IL-6 and decreased TcPO2/FiO2 in sepsis patients could predict the occurrence of septic shock early, and predictive value would further improve when combined with SOFA or APACHE Ⅱ score. Elevated blood IL-2R could indicate poor prognosis of sepsis, and predictive value for 28-day prognosis would further improve when combined with APACHE Ⅱ score.

     

/

返回文章
返回