高级检索

肺黏膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤临床特征及预后分析

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨肺黏膜相关淋巴组织(mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue,MALT)淋巴瘤的临床特征及预后。
    方法 回顾性分析2013年1月至2020年6月复旦大学附属中山医院血液科收治的77例初发肺MALT淋巴瘤患者的临床资料。
    结果 77例肺MALT淋巴瘤患者,男性32例(41.6%),女性45例(58.4%),中位发病年龄为59(24~85)岁。肺占位患者32例(41.6%),症状起病患者45例(58.4%),主要表现为肺部非特异性症状。AnnArbor分期为Ⅰ期14例(18.2%)、Ⅱ期3例(3.9%)、Ⅲ期1例(1.3%)、Ⅳ期59例(76.6%)。15例无治疗指征而观察随访,19例手术治疗,3例接受抗炎治疗,43例接受化疗治疗(化疗方案主要包括RC、R-CHOP、R2、BR等),2例患者拒绝治疗。一线治疗后最佳疗效,25例(32.5%)完全缓解,31例(40.2%)部分缓解,16例(20.8%)疾病稳定,2例(2.6%)病情进展,总体反应率72.7%。结束治疗后继续随访过程中,14例患者复发进展。随访截止时间为2020年11月20日,中位随访时间为35.3(5.5~96.0)个月,中位OS及PFS均未达到,5年OS率和PFS率分别为95.1%和73.2%。AnnArbor分期Ⅰ/Ⅱ期和Ⅲ/Ⅳ期患者的OS和PFS差异无统计学意义(P=0.455、0.834)。接受局部治疗(主要是手术)与接受全身治疗(化疗)的患者相比,接受化疗组患者远期PFS更好(P=0.004)。对于Ⅰ/Ⅱ期患者单独进行了不同治疗方案的PFS分析,趋势同整体人群相当。53例患者可计算POD24,7例患者POD24阳性,POD24对预后差异有统计学意义(P=0.046)。
    结论 肺MALT淋巴瘤总体预后较好,不同疾病分期OS、PFS差异无统计学意义。接受全身化疗可能为患者带来更长的获益,而单纯手术治疗可能与较差的PFS相关。POD24阳性与肺MALT淋巴瘤不良预后相关。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the clinical features and prognosis of pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma.
    Methods The clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of 77 patients with pulmonary MALT lymphoma were retrospectively analyzed, all of whom were diagnosed and treated at the Department of Hematology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from January 2013 to June 2020.
    Results The median age of 77 patients was 59 (24-85) years old, with 32 males (41.6%) and 45 females (58.4%). Thirty-two patients (41.6%) were diagnosed due to abnormal examination results, and 45 (58.4%) due to non-specific lung symptoms. According to AnnArbor staging, 14 (18.2%) cases were in stage Ⅰ, 3 (3.9%) cases in stage Ⅱ, 1 (1.3%) case in stage Ⅲ, and 59 (76.6%) cases in stage Ⅳ. 15 cases were followed up for long-term observation with no indication for treatment, 19 cases received surgical treatment, 3 cases received anti-inflammatory treatment, 43 cases received chemotherapy treatment (chemotherapy regimens mainly include RC, R-CHOP, R2, BR, etc.), and 2 patients refused treatment. For the best efficacy after first-line treatment, 25 (32.5%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), 31 (40.2%) achieved partial remission (PR), and 16 (20.8%) patients had stable disease (SD), 2 (2.6%) patients had progressed disease (PD), and the overall response rate was 72.7%. Fourteen patients relapsed and progressed during follow-up after the end of treatment. Up to November 20, 2020, the median follow-up time was 35.31(5.5-96.0) months, the disease-specific median overall survival (OS) time and median progression survival (PFS) were both not yet reached. The 5-year OS rate and 5-year PFS rate were 95.1% and 73.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS and PFS between different stages (Ⅰ/Ⅱ and Ⅲ/Ⅳ; P=0.455 and 0.834). Compared with patients who received local (mainly surgery) treatment, patients in the systemic treatment group (mainly chemotherapy) had better long-term PFS (P=0.04). PFS analysis of different treatment options was further performed in stage Ⅰ/Ⅱ group and the trend was similar. POD24 was available in 53 patients with 7 positive results. POD24 had significant difference in prognosis(P=0.046).
    Conclusions The overall prognosis of pulmonary MALT lymphoma is good. There is no significant difference in OS and PFS at different disease stages. Systemic chemotherapy may bring longer benefits, while surgery alone may be associated with poor PFS. POD24 is related to poor overall survival of pulmonary MALT lymphoma.

     

/

返回文章
返回