高级检索

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术双抗治疗1年后患者单用阿司匹林或氯吡格雷远期预后对比分析

Analysis of the prognostic differences and causes of patients taking aspirin or clopidogrel tablets 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention

  • 摘要:
    目的 比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术双抗治疗1年后患者服用阿司匹林或氯吡格雷远期预后差异,并分析原因。
    方法 回顾性分析2017年8月至12月植入药物涂层支架后采用双抗血小板治疗1年的168例患者的临床资料。依据患者抗血小板治疗1年后服药情况,将其分为阿司匹林组(100 mg/d,85例)和氯吡格雷组(75 mg/d,83例)。继续观察18个月,比较两组患者主要不良心血管事件(MACEs)以及服药期间出血情况。
    结果 两组患者心血管相关死亡、再发心绞痛、支架内再狭窄等观察终点事件差异无统计学意义,且均未发生严重出血事件。阿司匹林组轻中度出血比例明显高于氯吡格雷组(16.5% vs 4.8%,P=0.015),主要为胃出血事件增多(8.2% vs 1.2%,P=0.032)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线结果表明,随访期间两组MACEs发生率差异无统计学意义(log rank=0.014,P=0.905),但氯吡格雷组轻中度出血事件明显少于阿司匹林组(log rank=5.986,P=0.014)。发生出血事件的患者中女性比例(61.1% vs 34.0%,P=0.024)以及年龄(71.89±8.37)岁vs(64.75±9.02)岁,P=0.002)高于未出血患者。多因素logistic回归分析发现,年龄Exp(B)=4.771,95% CI 1.313~17.344,P=0.018、性别Exp(B)=0.361,95% CI 0.129~1.009,P=0.049为出血事件的独立危险因素。
    结论 PCI术双抗治疗1年后患者单用氯吡格雷或阿司匹林远期获益相似,但单用氯吡格雷后轻中度出血风险降低;PCI术双抗治疗1年后的高龄女性患者可考虑长期服用氯吡格雷片75 mg/d治疗。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To compared the prognosis of patients taking two different antiplatelet drugs, aspirin or clopidogrel 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to analyzed the causes of differences.
    Methods The clinical data of 168 patients underwent dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year after implanted drug-coated stents from August to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, the patients were divided into the aspirin group (100 mg/d, N=85) and clopidogrel group (75 mg/d, N=83), according to medicine they took 1 year after dual antiplatelet therapy. Then major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and bleeding complications were observed in the two groups for 18 months.
    Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in cardiovascular related death, recurrent angina pectoris, stent restenosis, and other endpoint events, and no serious bleeding events occurred in either group. The incidence of mild to moderate bleeding events in the aspirin group was significantly higher than that in the clopidogrel group (16.5% vs 4.8%, P=0.015), which was mainly related to the increase of gastric bleeding events in the aspirin group (8.2% vs 1.2%, P=0.032). Kaplan-Meier survival curve results further confirmed that there was no difference in the incidence of MACE events between the two groups during follow-up (log rank=0.014, P=0.905), but the incidence of mild and moderate bleeding events in the clopidogrel group was significantly lower than that in the aspirin group (log rank=5.986, P=0.014). The proportion of women (61.1% vs 34.0%, P=0.024) and age (71.89±8.37 vs64.75±9.02, P=0.002) in patients with bleeding events were significantly higher than those without bleeding. Logistic regression analysis showed that age (Exp (B)=4.771, 95%CI 1.313-17.344, P=0.018) and gender (Exp (B)=0.361, 95%CI 0.129-1.009, P=0.049) were independent risk factors for the bleeding events.
    Conclusions Patients singly taking aspirin or clopidogrel have similar long-term benefits 1 year after PCI, but the risk of mild to moderate bleeding is significantly reduced in patients taking clopidogrel alone, and 75 mg/d clopidogrel is suitable for elderly female patients 1 year after PCI.

     

/

返回文章
返回