高级检索

CT平扫及冠状位重建对泌尿系结石的诊断价值

Efficacy of nonenhanced CT with coronal reconstruction for the diagnosis of urolithiasis

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨CT平扫+冠状位重建技术对泌尿系结石的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2014—2016年在复旦大学附属中山医院住院行结石手术患者的资料,共125例患者符合分析条件,即首次入院治疗并同时有CT平扫+冠状位重建、B超检查和IVU(或CTU)的上尿路结石患者。所有患者均行B超检查和CT平扫+冠状位重建,其中行IVU检查97例,行CTU检查43例;肾结石61例,输尿管结石51例,肾输尿管结石13例。比较不同影像检查方法的检查时间、放射剂量、结石检出敏感性及结石远端输尿管显示率。结果:B超、IVU、CT平扫+冠状位重建和CTU检测结石的敏感性分别为84%(105/125)、73%(71/97)、100%(125/125)和100%(43/43),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。IVU结石远端输尿管显示率为49%(48/97),CT平扫+冠状位重建为84%(105/125),CTU为88%(38/43),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。IVU、CT平扫+冠状位重建和CTU的检查时间分别为20~30 min、2 min、20~30 min,有效放射剂量分别为3~7 msV、5~9 msV、15~40 msV。结论:CT平扫+冠状位重建在提供泌尿系结石诊治所必需信息的同时,还具备检查方便、耗时短、接受放射剂量少、无造影剂相关并发症的优势。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nonenhanced CT with coronal reconstruction for the diagnosis of urolithiasis and made comparisons with intravenous urography (IVU) and enhanced CT urography (CTU). Methods:Patients whom underwent surgery for urolithiasis in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from year 2014 to 2016 were analysed retrospectively, among 125 patients were selected for analysis. The criteria for patient selection include an initial treatment for upper urinary stones and concomitant examinations by ultrasound, nonenhanced CT with coronal reconstruction, and either intravenous urography (IVU) or urography (CTU). All 125 patients had ultrasound and nonenhanced CT with coronal reconstruction, while 97 of them had IVU and 43 had CTU. Regarding the site of stones, there were 61 renal calculi, 51 ureteral calculi and 13 renoureteral calculi. The examination time, radiological dose, stone detection rate, and visibility rate of the distal ureter below calculi using different imaging approaches were compared. Results:Sensitivity of stone detection using ultrasound, IVU, nonenhanced CT with coronal reconstruction and CTU was 84% (105/125), 73% (71/97), 100% (125/125), and 100% (43/43), respectively (P<0.001). The visibility rate of distal ureter was 49% (48/97) for IVU, 84% (105/125) for nonenhanced CT with coronal reconstruction, and 88% (38/43) for CTU (P<0.001). The examination time by IVU, nonenhanced CT and CTU was 2030 min, 2 min, and 2030 min, respectively; and the radiological dose was 37 msV, 59 msV, and 1540 msV. Conclusions:Nonenhanced CT with coronal reconstruction had higher stone detection rate compared to either ultrasound or IVU and led to lower dose of radiological exposure compared to CTU. Nonenhanced CT with coronal reconstruction could provide sufficient information for the diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis, with the characteristics such as convenience, short time in examination, few dose of radiological exposure, and free of contrastrelated complications. 〖BP(〗It could be regarded as the priority choice for those stones requiring specific treatment and an effective approach for followup as well.

     

/

返回文章
返回