高级检索

腔内激光闭合术与传统剥脱手术治疗小隐静脉曲张的对比研究

Endovenous laser ablation versus conventional surgery in the treatment of small saphenous vein varicose

  • 摘要: 目的:评估腔内激光闭合术(EVLA)治疗小隐静脉曲张的临床疗效。方法:通过与传统剥脱手术比较,采用非盲随机对照试验,将107例小隐静脉曲张患者分为51例EVLA组和56例传统手术组,分别进行EVLA术及高位结扎剥脱术,观察比较两组手术时间、住院时间、术后疼痛、术后并发症、症状改善情况、创口满意度及术后1年的复发率。结果:两组患者经治疗症状均得到明显改善;术后严重程度评分(VCSS)、生活质量评分(EQ-5D)差异无统计学意义。而EVLA组术后创口满意度较高(P<0.05);手术时间、住院时间均低于传统手术组(P<0.05)。EVLA组无创口感染及深静脉血栓发生。传统手术组发生神经损伤4例,EVLA组仅1例神经损伤。结论:腔内激光闭合术治疗小隐静脉曲张疗效与传统手术相当,但具有操作简便、术后恢复快、美容效果好等优势。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in the treatment of small saphenous veins varicose (SSV). Methods:A total of 107 patients with small saphenous veins varicose were divided into EVLA group (n=51) and operation group (n=56). EVLA and high ligation and stripping were performed respectively. Outcomes included duration of operation, hospital stay, postoperative pain, complication rates, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), Euro Quality of life (EQ-5D), Body Image Questionnaire (BIQ) after 3 months follow-up, and 1-year recurrence rate. Results:After treatment, the symptoms of both groups were significantly improved. There was no difference between the two groups in VCSS and EQ-5D. The wound satisfaction was higher in EVLA group (P<0.05), the operation time and hospitalization time were lower than those in the operation group (P<0.05). No wound infection and deep venous thrombosis occurred in the EVLA group. Four patients had nerve injury in the operation group and only one patient had nerve injury in the EVLA group. Conclusions:EVLA has the same clinical efficacy as conventional surgery, and it is easier to operate. Patients undergoing EVLA have fewer complications and good cosmetic effect.

     

/

返回文章
返回