高级检索

频率适应性房室延迟单左心室起搏实现心脏再同步化疗效分析及对右心室收缩功能的影响

Clinical effect of rate-adaptive atrioventricular delay single left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization and evaluation of right ventricular systolic function

  • 摘要: 目的:采用三腔起搏器频率适应性房室延迟(RAAVD)功能,探索通过单左心室起搏实现心脏再同步(CRT)的效果,并评价该方式下右心室的收缩功能。方法:选择慢性心力衰竭患者30例,随机分成单左心室起搏组和双心室起搏组,各15例。植入起搏器后优化两组起搏参数,比较两组患者术前及术后12个月的房室间期(AVD)、QRS时限、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心房内径(LAD)、左心室舒张末内径(LVEDD)、二尖瓣反流面积(MRA)、三尖瓣环收缩期位移(TAPSE)、左心室舒张充盈时间占心动周期的比例(LVFT/RR)、心室间机械延迟时间(IVMD)、前间隔与后壁收缩期轴向应变达峰时间差(SPWMD)的差异,评估频率适应性房室延迟单左心室起搏与传统双心室起搏的疗效,评价心脏再同步化治疗中右心室收缩功能的改变。结果:与术前相比,单左心室起搏组与双心室起搏组患者术后12个月LVEF、TAPSE、LVFT/RR均增大,AVD、QRS时限、LVEDD、MRA、IVMD、SPWMD均减小,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。与双心室起搏组相比,术后单左心室起搏组AVD、TAPSE、LVFT/RR增大(P<0.01);QRS时限、程控优化时间缩短(P<0.01);起搏器电池预估寿命延长(P<0.01);MRA减小(P<0.05)。结论:RAAVD单左心室起搏与传统双心室起搏均可改善心衰患者心功能;前者在延长左心室舒张期充盈时间、缩短QRS间期及改善右心室收缩功能方面优于后者,且能缩短程控优化时间、延长起搏器电池寿命。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To explore the effect of single left ventricular pacing achieved cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the change of right ventricular systolic function by using three chamber pacemaker rate adaptive atrio-ventricular delay function. Methods:Thirty patients with heart failure were selected, and were randomly divided into single left ventricular pacing group and double ventricular pacing group (15 patients in each group). The differences of AVD, QRS duration, LVEF, LAD, LVEDD, MRA, TAPSE, LVFT/RR, IVMD, and SPWMD were compared between the two groups before surgery and 12 months after surgery. The effect of the single-left ventricular pacing and the traditional biventricular pacing, and the changes of the systolic function were evaluated after the cardiac resynchronization treatment. Results:Compared to the preoperative period, LVEF, TAPSE, and LVFT/RR were increased, and AVD, QRS duration, LVEDD, MRA, IVMD, and SPWMD were reduced 12 months after the operation both in the single left ventricular pacing group and the double-ventricular pacing group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Compared to single-left ventricular pacing group, AVD, TAPSE, and LVFT/RR increased (P<0.01); QRS and program-controlled optimization time shortened (P<0.01), and pacemaker battery life expectancy and the MRA decreased (P<0.05) in the double ventricular pacing group after the operation. Conclusions:Single-left ventricular pacing via rate adaptive atrio-ventricular delay and biventricular pacing can improve cardiac function in patients with heart failure. The former is superior to the latter in extending the left ventricular diastolic filling time, shortening the QRS interval and improving the right ventricular systolic function, and can shorten the program control optimization time and prolong the battery life of the pacemaker.

     

/

返回文章
返回