高级检索

右室间隔主动电极起搏治疗缓慢性室性心律失常的安全性及有效性

Safety and efficacy analysis of right ventricular active electrode on cardiac function in patients with bradycardiac arrhythmia

  • 摘要: 目的:评价右室间隔主动电极起搏治疗缓慢性室性心律失常的安全性及有效性。方法:选择因缓慢性室性心律失常需植入永久性起搏器患者共56 例(其中植入DDD起搏器患者42例),术后第1、3、6、12个月随访,12个月后每年随访1次,特殊情况即时就诊。术后第6个月时评估患者临床症状、生活质量、6 min步行距离、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)指标及起搏参数,对比术前、术后6个月上述各指标的变化。结果:起搏器植入术后6个月,患者生活质量、6 min步行距离、血清B型脑钠肽(brain natriuretic peptide, BNP)测定值较术前明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);LVEF、LVEDD差异无统计学意义;在部分轻度心功能不全患者中,LVEF及大小变化差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:右室间隔起搏安全可行,能增加左心室射血分数且不影响双心室同步性,可替代右心室心尖部起搏。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of right ventricular active electrode on cardiac function in patients with bradycardiac arrhythmia. Methods:A total of 56 patients with bradycardiac arrhythmia who needed permanent pacemaker implantation were enrolled (42 patients were implanted with DDD pacemaker). Follow-up was carried out at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months after operation, and once a year after 12 months. The patients’ clinical symptoms, quality of life, 6-min walk test (6MWT), serum level of brain natriuretic (BNP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and pacing parameters were evaluated at the 6th month after surgery. The changes of the above indexes before and 6 months after surgery were compared. Results:Six months after pacemaker implantation, the quality of life, 6MWT and BNP measurements of patients were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). But there was no statistical difference between LVEF and LVEDD. In some patients with mild cardiac insufficiency, the LVEF difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions:Right ventricular septal pacing is safe and feasible. It can increase left ventricular ejection fraction without affecting biventricular synchrony and can replace right ventricular apex pacing.

     

/

返回文章
返回