高级检索

磁共振成像表观扩散系数对前列腺癌分级诊断的价值

Diagnosis value of apparent diffusion coefficient of magnetic resonance imaging in grading of prostate cancer

  • 摘要: 目的:回顾分析前列腺癌、前列腺增生及正常前列腺的磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)信号差异,探讨表观扩散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)在前列腺癌分级中的价值。方法:收集复旦大学附属中山医院2013年1月至2014年3月收治的前列腺癌患者40例(包括高危组和低中危组)和前列腺增生患者11例,均经手术或穿刺病理诊断证实;同时,入组正常对照组20例,均为健康志愿者。所有患者及健康志愿者均已签署知情同意书。对3组患者及志愿者进行常规MRI检查及弥散加权成像(magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging,DWI)检查,比较各组的T2WI信号强度、T1WI平扫动静脉期的信号强度和ADC值,并将前列腺癌的ADC值与Gleason评分进行相关分析,确定利用ADC值鉴别高危与低中危前列腺癌的临界值。结果:在T2WI信号强度和ADC值方面,前列腺癌组、前列腺增生组和正常对照组依次递增,3组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);在T1WI信号强度方面,只有正常前列腺中央带的动静脉期信号强度差值显著高于前列腺癌组和前列腺增生组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。前列腺癌的ADC值与Gleason评分负相关(r=-0.401,P=0.010),即Gleason评分越高,ADC值越小。以ADC值0.70×10-3 mm2/s为临界值,鉴别诊断低中危组和高危组前列腺癌的敏感度为96.4%,特异度为58.3%。结论:T2WI信号强度和ADC值可用于鉴别前列腺癌、前列腺增生及正常前列腺,T1WI动静脉期信号差值也有一定的参考价值;前列腺癌ADC值与Gleason评分有一定的相关性,提示ADC值可用于前列腺癌临床危险度的分级诊断。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To retrospectively analyze the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal differences between prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and normal prostate, and to explore the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in prostate cancer grading. Methods:Forty cases of prostate cancer and eleven cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University between January 2013 to March 2014 were enrolled, which were all confirmed by surgery or biopsy. At the same time, 20 normal cases were arranged as the control group, which were healthy volunteers. All the patients and volunteers were obtained informed consent. The T2WI signal intensity, T1WI signal intensity (including unenhanced, arterial and venous phase) and ADC value of the three groups were compared after MRI and magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). Then the correlation between ADC value of prostate cancer and Gleason score was analyzed to determine the critical value of ADC in the identification of high-risk and low-risk prostate cancer. Results:In terms of T2WI signal intensity and ADC values, there were significant differences among the three groups (P<0.05). In terms of T1WI signal intensity, only the difference of dynamic and venous phase in central gland of normal prostate was significantly different from that in prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia (P<0.05),with the former higher than the latter two. The ADC value of prostate cancer was negatively correlated with Gleason score (r=-0.401, P=0.010). The higher the Gleason score, the smaller the ADC value. When the critical value of ADC was 0.70×10-3 mm2/s, the sensitivity of identifying low/intermediate-risk group and high-risk group for prostate cancer was 96.4%, and the specificity was 58.3%. Conclusions: T2WI signal intensity and ADC value can be used to identify prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and normal prostate. T2WI signal differences of dynamic and venous phase also have a certain reference value. The ADC value of prostate cancer is related to Gleason score, suggesting that it may be used for grading the clinical risk of prostate cancer.

     

/

返回文章
返回