高级检索

微创Wiltse入路治疗胸腰段椎体骨折

  • 摘要: 目的:比较微创Wiltse入路与传统后正中入路治疗胸腰段骨折的疗效。方法:2010年11月至2014年6月,采用椎弓根钉棒系统复位固定治疗AO分型A型胸腰段骨折患者50例,其中经微创Wiltse入路28例,经传统后正中入路22例。术前神经功能按美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分级标准均为E级。骨折节段分别为T11骨折4例,T12骨折10例,L1骨折26例,L2骨折10例。受伤至手术的时间为2~13 d,平均4.9 d。记录并分析围手术期指标、术后疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分的差异以及椎体后凸Cobb角以评价矫正效果。结果:所有患者均获得随访12~26个月,平均15个月。微创Wiltse入路组在手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量及术后负压引流量方面均明显低于传统后正中入路组(P<0.05),术后24、48 h患者疼痛VAS评分明显低于传统后正中入路组(P<0.05);两组患者术后Cobb角均较术前明显恢复(P<0.05),但两组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:针对AO分型为A型且ASIA分级为E级的胸腰椎骨折,微创Wiltse入路比传统后正中入路具有手术创伤小、椎旁肌损伤轻、置钉简便、术后腰痛症状轻以及可有效矫正后凸畸形等优势,值得临床推广。提示微创Wiltse入路是一种容易掌握、值得在边远地区推广来治疗胸腰段骨折的手术方式。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To compare the clinical values of minimally invasive Wiltse approach and conventional posterior approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures. Methods:From November 2010 to June 2014, the pedicle screwrod fixation system was used to treat thoracolumbar fractures (AO type A) in 50 patients. Among them, 28 cases were treated by minimally invasive Wiltse approach, and other 22 cases were treated by conventional posterior median approach. Based on American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading standards, the spinal cord injury function of all cases were grade E before operation. All fractures were singlesegment fracture, including T11 in 4 cases, T12 in 10 cases, L1 in 26 cases, and L2 in 10 cases. The time from injury to operation varied from 2 to 13 days (mean, 4.9 days). Perioperative parameters, visual analogue scale (VAS) score of postoperative pain and the kyphotic Cobb angle of vertebral bodies for evaluating the correction effect were recorded and analyzed. Results:All cases were followed up for 1226 months (mean, 15 months). The operation time, hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage volume in the group of minimally invasive Wiltse approach were significantly less than those in the group of conventional posterior midline approach (P<0.05). The VAS scores in minimally invasive Wiltse approach group were significantly less than those in conventional approach group in 24 and 48 hours after operation (P<0.05). Cobb angles of the two groups were obviously recovered after operation as compared with those before operation (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups before and after operation (all P > 0.05). Conclusions:For the thoracolumbar vertebral fractures (AO type A, ASIA grade E), compared with the conventional approach, minimally invasive Wiltse approach has the advantages of less surgical traumas, less vertebral side tissue injury, easy for pedicle screw insertion, light postoperative lumbar back pain, and effective correction of kyphosis deformity. It is suggested that minimally invasive Wiltse approach is worth to be popularized in remote areas for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

     

/

返回文章
返回