高级检索

Frailty评分预测老年多发性骨髓瘤的临床分析

The Frailty score in the prognosis of elderly multiple myeloma patients

  • 摘要: 目的:运用Frailty评分体系预测老年多发性骨髓瘤(multiplemyeloma,MM)患者临床转归的研究分析。方法:对复旦大学附属中山医院血液科2015年1月1日至2016年2月29日收治的29例65岁以上老年MM患者进行Frailty评分,以分析其与患者临床转归的关系。结果:Frailty评分高危组13例(44.8%)、中危组5例(17.2%)、低危组11例(37.9%),3组患者在ISS分期(P=0.281)和化疗强度(P=0.475)上的差异无统计学意义。Frailty高危组患者不良反应较多,血液学3级及以上不良发生率(69.2%)显著高于低危组(18.2%,P=0.014)和中危组(0.0,P=0.011);高危组非血液学3级及以上不良反应发生率(84.6%)显著高于低危组(18.2%,P=0.001)和中危组(20.0%,P=0.011)。高危组中有69.2%的患者中断、延缓化疗或减小化疗强度,显著高于低危组(9.1%,P=0.004),与中危组差异无统计学意义(40.0%,P=0.268)。高危组患者化疗后获完全缓解(CR)及极好的部分缓解(VGPR)的患者占30.8%、部分缓解(PR)者占23.1%、无效(NR)者占46.2%,显著低于低危组(CR及VGPR63.6%、PR36.4%、NR0.0,P=0.027),与中危组比较差异无统计学意义(CR及VGPR40.0%、PR20.0%、NR40.0%,P=0.751)。结论:Frailty评分体系可预测高危患者治疗的不良反应和疗效,高危患者预后差,但其对预后评估价值的大小有待更大样本量的阐明。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the role of Frailty score in prognosis the outcome of elderly multiple myeloma patients. Methods: Twenty nine multiple myeloma patients above 65 year-old diagnosed from January 1, 2015 to February 29, 2016, were enrolled in the retrospect study (one case was relapse patient, the other 24 cases were newly diagnosed patients). Frailty score assessment was performed and its relation with clinical outcome were analyzed. Results: The 29 patients were classified into high risk group(n=13, 45%), mediate group (n=5,17%), and low risk group (n=11, 38%). There were no differneces in the aspects of ISS stage(P=0.2807) or chemotherapy intensity(P=0. 0.4752) among the three groups. Thus, the two factors did not affect the analysis. More patients (69.2%) in the Frailty high risk group suffered severe hematologic adverse events (≥grade 3) as compared to low risk group (18.2%, P=0.0144), and to mediate risk group (0%, P=0.0106). As to the severe non-hematologic adverse events (≥grade 3), the occurrence in high risk group was 84.6%, higher than that of low risk group(18.2%, P=0.0014) and that of mediate risk group(20.0%, P=0.0114). Higher rate of chemotherapy discontinuation, delay or chemotherapy intensity reduction was observed in the high risk goup(76.9%), when the parameter of low, mediate risk group was 9.1% (P=0.0036), and 40.0%(P=0.2682). In the terms of therapy efficacy, 30.8%, 23.1%, and 46.1% patients obtained complete remission or very good remission(CR VGPR), partial remission (PR), and no remission (NR) in the high risk group, which was inferior related to that of low risk group(CR VGPR 63.6%, PR 36.4%, NR 0.0, P=0.027). The efficacy of high risk group was comparable with that of mediate risk group (CR VGPR 40.0%, PR 20.0%, NR 20.0%, P=0.7508).Conclusion: According to our preliminary data, the Frailty score is helpful in prognosis the treatment tolerance and effect of elderly multiple myeloma patients. The high risk group would have a poor outcome. However, the Frailty score system’s prognosis effect in elderly MM patients in China would be tested in further study.

     

/

返回文章
返回