高级检索

乳腺癌真空辅助旋切术后保乳手术的可行性

Feasibility of breast-conserving surgery after breast cancer mass removal by ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨超声引导下真空辅助活检(vacuumassisted biopsy, VAB)切除乳腺癌肿块后保乳手术的可行性与安全性。方法:选择2008年1月至2014年12月VAB肿块切除术后行保乳手术治疗的45例浸润性导管癌(invasive ductal carcinoma, IDC)患者 (VAB组)。选取同一时期单发、直径小于2 cm、肿块切除活检后行保乳手术的147例IDC患者为对照组。分析并比较两组患者的临床病理特征与预后。结果:VAB组肿块均单发、直径<2 cm且不可触及,影像学检查误诊为良性。所有VAB手术只行1次穿刺,穿刺点距离肿块的平均距离为(2.52±0.89) cm。中位切割8次,影像学检查示完全切除,平均手术时间(25.4±7.6) min,术中未发生活动性出血。保乳手术距VAB术平均(4.50±0.92) d;局部扩大切除病灶的各个切缘均阴性;无患者发生肿瘤细胞针道或皮肤穿刺点种植;3例残腔残留少量导管原位癌病灶,但无浸润性癌灶。VAB组与对照组平均年龄、年龄构成、肿块直径、肿瘤组织学分级、脉管侵犯、淋巴结分期、前哨淋巴结阳性率、肿瘤分子分型及辅助治疗、腋窝手术差异均无统计学意义。两组间5年无病生存期(diseasefree survival,DFS)和5年总生存期(overall survival,OS)差异均无统计学意义。 结论:VAB切除不可触及的较小乳腺癌肿块后续行保乳手术安全可行,值得进一步大样本研究。

     

    Abstract: Objective:To explore the feasibility and safety of breastconserving surgery after tumor mass removal by ultrasoundguided vacuumassisted biopsy (VAB). Methods:Fortyfive cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) who underwent breastconserving surgery after removal of tumor mass by VAB from January 2008 to December 2014 were selected as the VAB group. A total of 147 cases of IDC who underwent breastconserving surgery after removal of tumor mass (single and less than 2 cm) by open excision during the same period were selected as the control group. The clinicalpathological characteristics and survival prognosis of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results:All cases in VAB group had a single, impalpable tumor mass less than 2 cm, which was presumed benign according to imaging examination. There was only one puncture in all VAB operations, and the average distance from the puncture point to the tumor mass was (2.52±0.89) cm. The median incision was 8 times, the imaging examination showed complete resection, the mean operation time was (25.4±7.6) min, and no active bleeding occurred during operation. Breast conserving surgery was performed (4.50±0.92) d after VAB. Residual cavity, needle tract and skin puncture site were excised completely with negative margin. No tumor cell displacement in needle tract or skin site was observed. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) rather than invasive carcinoma was observed in residual cavity in three cases. There were no statistically significant differences between two groups either in mean age, age structure, tumor size, histological grade, vessel invasion, lymph node staging, sentinel lymph node positive rate, molecular type, adjuvant therapy or axillary surgery, or in 5year DFS or 5year OS as well. Conclusions:Breastconserving surgery after impalpable small breast cancer mass removal by ultrasoundguided VAB is safe and feasible.

     

/

返回文章
返回