高级检索

不同人表皮生长因子受体2表达水平三阴性乳腺癌的X线影像特征初步探讨

Preliminary exploration of X-ray imaging features in triple-negative breast cancer with different expression levels of human epidermalgrowth factor receptor 2

  • 摘要:
    目的 初步探讨三阴性乳腺癌(triple-negative breast cancer, TNBC)在不同人表皮生长因子受体2(human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, HER2)表达水平下,数字乳腺断层摄影(digital breast tomosynthesis, DBT)与对比增强乳腺X线摄影(contrast-enhanced mammography, CEM)的表现特征。
    方法 回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年12月在上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院及2022年1月至2025年5月在上海市第二人民医院诊治的术前行DBT或CEM检查TNBC患者的临床资料、病理和免疫组织化学结果、影像资料。
    结果 共纳入69例经病理证实为浸润性导管癌的TNBC患者,其中34例行DBT检查、35例行CEM检查。69例TNBC中,HER2低表达34例(49.28%),HER2零表达35例(50.72%)。DBT检查结果显示,HER2低表达组(n=14)肿块的毛刺征占比高于HER2零表达组(n=20;P=0.009, Padj=0.045);两组在乳腺密度类型、肿块形状及钙化情况方面的差异无统计学意义。CEM结果显示,在低能量图像上,HER2低表达组(n=20)肿块的毛刺征占比高于HER2零表达组(n=15;P=0.011, Padj=0.077);在重建图像上,两组背景实质强化程度及肿块强化方式差异无统计学意义,均以不均匀强化最常见、均匀强化次之、环形强化占比最低。
    结论  HER2低表达和HER2零表达的TNBC在DBT中的毛刺征表现可能存在差异,而CEM表现与HER2不同表达水平TNBC之间的关联尚需进一步研究。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To preliminary explore the imaging manifestations of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with different levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression.
    Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on TNBC patients who underwent preoperative DBT or CEM examinations at Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January 2018 to December 2019 and Shanghai Second People’s Hospital from January 2022 to May 2025. Clinical data, pathological and immunohistochemical results, and imaging data were collected.
    Results A total of 69 TNBC patients pathologically confirmed as invasive ductal carcinoma were included, among which 34 underwent DBT and 35 underwent CEM. Among these patients, 34 (49.28%) had HER2-low expression and 35 (50.72%) had HER2-zero expression. DBT results showed that the proportion of spiculation signs in HER2-low group (n=14) was significantly higher than that in HER2-zero group (n=20; P=0.009, Padj=0.045). However, there were no significant differences in breast density type, mass shape, or calcification between the two groups. CEM results showed that on low-energy images, the proportion of spiculation signs in the HER2-low group (n=20) was higher than that in the HER2-zero group (n=15; P=0.011, Padj=0.077). Results of CEM showed that on reconstructed images, differences in background parenchymal enhancement and mass enhancement patterns between the two groups were not statistically significant; in both groups, heterogeneous enhancement was the most common, followed by homogeneous enhancement, with ring enhancement being the least common.
    Conclusions TNBC with low HER2 expression and TNBC with zero HER2 expression may have potential differences in the presentation of spiculation signs on DBT. However, the correlation between CEM manifestations and TNBC with different HER2 expression levels requires further research.

     

/

返回文章
返回