| Citation: |
QU D Z, CHEN C C. Clinical efficiency of three-dimensional image registration in robot-assisted surgery for lumbar disc herniation[J]. Chin J Clin Med, 2024, 31(6): 966-970. DOI: 10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2024.20241012
|
To explore the application effect of robot-assisted surgery combined with three-dimensional (3D) image registration for lumbar disc herniation.
112 patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent surgery in Baoji Central Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected, and were divided into the robot-assisted surgery group (robot group, n＝56) and traditional open surgery group (traditional group, n＝56). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and other indicators were compared between the two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the efficacy at 6 and 12 months after surgery.
There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), disease course and lesion segment between the robot group and the traditional group. In the robot group, the average image registration time was (7.8±2.1) min, the registration accuracy was within 1 mm, and the success rate of intraoperative navigation positioning was 98.21% (55/56). Compared with traditional group, the operation time and postoperative hospital stay were shorter and intraoperative blood loss was less in the robot group (P＜0.01). The total incidence of postoperative complications was 3.57% (2/56) and 14.29% (8/56) in the robot group and the traditional group, respectively (P＞0.05). The VAS scores and ODI values in the robot group were lower than those in the traditional group at 6 and 12 months after surgery (P＜0.01).
The application of 3D medical image registration technology in robot-assisted lumbar disc herniation surgery can significantly improve surgical precise positioning, shorten operation time, reduce blood loss, and improve postoperative function, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
| [1] |
CUI G Y, HAN X G, WEI Y, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis[J]. Orthop Surg, 2021, 13(7): 1960-1968. DOI: 10.1111/os.13044
|
| [2] |
YAMOUT T, OROSZ L D, GOOD C R, et al. Technological advances in spine surgery: navigation, robotics, and augmented reality[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2023, 54(2): 237-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2022.11.008
|
| [3] |
ZAWAR A, CHHABRA H S, MUNDRA A, et al. Robotics and navigation in spine surgery: a narrative review[J]. J Orthop, 2023, 44: 36-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.08.007
|
| [4] |
MCAFEE P C, LIEBERMAN I, THEODORE N. Innovations in robotics and navigation[J]. Int J Spine Surg, 2021, 15(s2): S7-S9. DOI: 10.14444/8135
|
| [5] |
BURSTRÖM G, NACHABE R, PERSSON O, et al. Augmented and virtual reality instrument tracking for minimally invasive spine surgery: a feasibility and accuracy study[J]. Spine, 2019, 44(15): 1097-1104. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003006
|
| [6] |
ANAND M, PANWAR S. Role of navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a surgeon’s perspectives[J]. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent, 2021, 13: 127-139. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S299249
|
| [7] |
LOPEZ I B, BENZAKOUR A, MAVROGENIS A, et al. Robotics in spine surgery: systematic review of literature[J]. Int Orthop, 2023, 47(2): 447-456. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05508-9
|
| [8] |
FAN Y, DU J P, LIU J J, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement comparing robot-assisted technology and the free-hand with fluoroscopy-guided method in spine surgery: an updated meta-analysis[J]. Medicine, 2018, 97(22): e10970. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010970
|
| [9] |
GHASEM A, SHARMA A, GREIF D N, et al. The arrival of robotics in spine surgery: a review of the literature[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2018, 43(23): 1670-1677. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002695
|
| [10] |
BEYER R S, NGUYEN A, BROWN N J, et al. Spinal robotics in cervical spine surgery: a systematic review with key concepts and technical considerations[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2023, 38(1): 66-74. DOI: 10.3171/2022.7.SPINE22473
|
| [11] |
PARK C, SHABANI S, AGARWAL N, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery and navigation in deformity surgery[J]. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2023, 34(4): 659-664. DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.05.002
|
| [12] |
邵 为, 林 涛, 仲海燕, 等. 腰椎退变性侧凸患者后路矫形融合术后健康相关生活质量影响因素分析[J]. 中国临床医学, 2019, 26(2): 260-264. DOI: 10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2019.20181110
SHAO W, LIN T, ZHONG H Y, et al. Analysis of factors affecting postoperative health-related quality of life in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis[J]. J China Clin Med Imag, 2019, 26(2): 260-264. DOI: 10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2019.20181110
|
| [13] |
KHAN A, MEYERS J E, SIASIOS I, et al. Next-generation robotic spine surgery: first report on feasibility, safety, and learning curve[J]. Oper Neurosurg, 2019, 17(1): 61-69. DOI: 10.1093/ons/opy280
|
DownLoad: